MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402011660 · doi:10.21037/tcr-23-2302

The expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) involves in the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic implications of testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT): a systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4402011660 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peifeng Li, Yuwei Zhong, Miaotao Zhang, Yonghong Zheng, Wei Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Cancer Research · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisTesticular Germ Cell TumorProgrammed cell death 1OncologyCellBiologyProgrammed cell deathCancer researchMedicineInternal medicinePD-L1Testicular cancerCancerApoptosisGeneticsImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) is a type of tumor with relatively lower incidence but being more prevalent in young men. The expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) serves as a potential biomarker for predicting the survival outcomes of other tumors. Some studies discovered higher prevalence of PD-L1 in TGCT patients who achieved favorable treatment outcomes, while other studies showed lower or absent expression of PD-L1 in TGCT with the better prognosis as well. Therefore, in order to address this controversy and clarify the association between the expression of PD-L1 and pathological features and prognosis of TGCT, this meta-analysis was conducted. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using following search terms: "testis", "testicle", "testicular", "cancer", "carcinoma", "tumor", "neoplasm", "programmed cell death ligand 1", "programmed death ligand 1", "PD-L1", "PDL1", "B7 homolog 1", "B7-H1", "B7H1" and "CD274". Relevant studies were retrieved according to the inclusion criteria from reputable databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). These studies investigated the expression of PD-L1 in both tumor cells and tumor infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) in TGCT. The overall proportion of PD-L1 positivity was assessed using R programming. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Revman software to evaluate the involvement of PD-L1 expression in TGCT. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality assessment of included studies. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation were subsequently performed. Results: TIICs exhibited higher prevalence rates in seminoma (OR =2.11, 95% CI: 1.57-2.84) and embryonal carcinoma (OR =6.23, 95% CI: 2.42-16.02) patients. Notably, PD-L1 expression in TIICs displayed a tendency to increase in TGCT patients with lower stages or without lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: PD-L1 expression was observed in choriocarcinoma tumor cells, while yolk sac tumor and teratoma tumor cells exhibited lower or absent expression of PD-L1. Conversely, PD-L1 expression in TIICs was associated with seminoma and embryonal carcinoma, which was more commonly observed in TGCT patients with lower stages and better prognosis, thereby providing a theoretical foundation for the application of immunotherapy in relapsed/refractory TGCT patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.273
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational Cancer ResearchSame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207