Input-to-state hybrid impulsive formation stabilization for multi-agent systems with impulse delays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the input-to-state formation stabilization problem of nonlinear multi-agent systems within a hybrid impulsive framework, considering delay-dependent impulses, strong nonlinearity, and deception attack signals. By leveraging Lyapunov functionals, impulsive comparison theory, average impulsive interval methods, and graph theory, we develop novel criteria for possessing locally input-to-state and integral input-to-state formation stabilization across different impulse sequence classes. These criteria are expressed in terms of continuous/impulsive feedback gains, time delay size, nonlinearity strength, uniform upper bound of impulsive interval, and length of average impulsive interval. Notably, the design of control impulses benefit the destabilizing continuous dynamics in the formation stabilization process. To demonstrate the effectiveness and validity of the analytical results, we provide numerical simulation examples involving various types of external attack signals. • Input-to-state formation stabilization via a hybrid impulsive control is proposed. • Novel criteria on input-to-state stability via complex delayed impulses are derived. • The control scheme’s effectiveness with attack signals is shown through simulations. • The tolerance for system instability from continuous dynamics has been increased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it