MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402023069 · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2024.107027

Protocols to enable fluorescence microscopy of microbial interactions on living maize silks (style tissue)

2024· article· en· W4402023069 on OpenAlexafffund
Michelle E. H. Thompson, Manish N. Raizada

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microbiological Methods · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsGrain Farmers of Ontario
KeywordsBiologyConfocal microscopyFluorescence microscopeSILKPetri dishMicrobiologyFluorescenceCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is interest in studying microbes that colonize maize silks (style tissue, critical for reproduction) including the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum (Fg) and its interactions with the microbiome and biocontrol agents. In planta imaging of these interactions on living silks using confocal fluorescence microscopy would provide key insights. However, newly discovered microbes have unknown effects on human health, and there are regulatory requirements to prevent the release of fluorescently tagged microbes into the environment. Therefore, the microbe infection, colonization, and interaction stages on silks prior to microscopy must be contained. At the same time, silk viability must be maintained and experiments conducted that are biologically relevant (e.g. silks should remain attached to the cob), yet the silk tissue must be accessible to the researcher (i.e. not within husk leaves) and allow for multiple replicates. Here we present methods that meet these five contrasting criteria. We tested these methods using Fg and four silk-derived bacterial endophytes. The endophytes were previously known to have anti-Fg activity in vitro, but in planta observations were lacking. In Method 1, a portion of the tip of a cob was dissected, and silks remained attached to the cob in a Petri dish. The cob was placed on a water agar disc to maintain hydration. DsRed-tagged bacteria and GFP-tagged Fg were inoculated onto the silks and incubated, allowing the two microbes to grow towards one another before staining with propidium iodide for confocal microscopy. A variation of the protocol was presented in Method 2, where detached silk segments were placed directly on water agar where they were inoculated with bacteria and Fg to promote dense colonization, and to allow for many replicates and interventions such as silk wounding. The bacterial endophytes were successfully observed colonizing Fg hyphae, silk trichomes, and entering silks via cut ends and wounds. These protocols can be used to study other silk-associated microbes including several globally important fungal pathogens that enter maize grain through silks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Microbiological MethodsSame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207