MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402025324 · doi:10.3749/2300056

Using Sulfide Mineral Chemistry to Understand PGE Mineralization Processes in the Platreef, Bushveld Igneous Complex, South Africa

2024· article· en· W4402025324 on OpenAlexaff
Sharlotte C. Mkhonto, Pedro J. Jugo, Matthew I. Leybourne, Danie F. Grobler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsStillwater (Canada)Arthur B. McDonald-Canadian Astroparticle Physics Research InstituteLaurentian UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralization (soil science)GeologyGeochemistryChalcopyriteIgneous rockSulfidePyrrhotitePentlanditeSulfide mineralsCountry rockMineral explorationMineralogyChemistryPyriteCopperSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Platreef in the Northern limb of the Bushveld Igneous Complex, South Africa, is a complex lithological unit containing significant PGE-Ni-Cu mineralization. Because the Platreef is characterized by intense magma–country rock interaction, there is no consensus regarding (a) whether crustal assimilation during emplacement triggered the mineralization processes and (b) its correlation in terms of mineralization processes with the PGE-rich Merensky Reef (Western and Eastern limbs of the Bushveld Igneous Complex). Understanding the mineralization processes (processes related to ore genesis) in the Platreef could help with the exploration of new deposits elsewhere. To answer these questions, we hypothesized that major and trace element contents in major sulfide minerals (pyrrhotite, Po; pentlandite, Pn; chalcopyrite, Ccp) from contaminated and little to non-contaminated intervals could be used to track different origins. Three suites of samples were used: (1) atypical samples intersected during deep drilling, showing high PGE grades with minimal evidence of country rock assimilation, followed by increasing assimilation with depth; (2) representative samples of the main orebody (the “Flatreef”); and (3) reference samples from the Merensky Reef. The data were acquired using electron-probe microanalysis and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The results validate the hypothesis that sulfide mineral chemistry from contaminated and little to non-contaminated intervals can be used to track different geochemical processes. For instance, Se contents in sulfide minerals associated with mineralization are higher than in those associated with crustal assimilation and lower PGE grades. In contrast, Co contents in Po and Pn increase with crustal contamination. Thus, in the study area, Se/Co in Po and Pn are excellent indicators of the degree of country rock assimilation. Secondly, other trace elements (such as Ru in Po, and Pd in Pn) are significantly higher in intervals with high PGE grades and match the characteristics of reference samples from the Merensky Reef. These results, combined with recently available S and Sr isotopic data, constitute substantial evidence that PGE-Ni-Cu mineralization in the Flatreef and the Merensky Reef were likely caused by the same processes and from the same magmas. Assimilation of local country rocks during emplacement of BIC magmas in the Northern limb was therefore not the trigger of sulfide saturation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and PetrologySame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207