Efficient molecular mendelian randomization screens with LaScaMolMR.jl
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Summary The ever-growing genetic cohorts lead to an increase in scale of molecular Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) studies, creating opportunities for more extensive two samples Mendelian randomization (MR) investigations aiming to identify causal relationships between molecular traits and diseases. This increase led to the identification of multiple causal candidates and potential drug targets over time. However, the increase in scale of such studies and higher dimension multi-omic data come with computational challenges. We present “LArge SCAle MOLecular Mendelian Randomization with Julia” (LaScaMolMR.jl), an open-sourced integrated Julia package optimized for Omic-wide Mendelian Randomization (OWMR) Studies. This versatile package eliminates the two-language problem and implements fast algorithms for instrumental variable selection approaches with both cis and trans instruments and performs the most popular regression estimators for MR studies with molecular exposures. It reduces the compute time via meta-programming allowing easy deployment of multi-threaded approach and the internalization of linkage disequilibrium investigation of potential instrumental variables. Via its integrated approach and high-computational performance, LaScaMolMR.jl allows users who have minimal programming experience to perform large scale OWMR studies. Implementation and availability LaScaMolMR is freely available at github.com/SamuelMathieu-code/LaScaMolMR.jl .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".