MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402031557 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2024-0035

Deciphering the complete plastid genome of an endemic monotypic species <i>Kostermansia malayana</i> (Malvaceae) from Peninsular Malaysia: structural comparative genomics and phylogenomic placement

2024· article· en· W4402031557 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xue Jing Wong, Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Wan Hee Cheng, Ahmad Faizal, Samsuddin Ahmad Syazwan, Shiou Yih Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMalvaceaePlastidGenomeBotanyGenomicsEvolutionary biologyGeneticsChloroplastGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kostermansia malayana Soegeng, a species of Malvaceae endemic to the Malay Peninsula, is threatened by its rare flowering rate and habitat loss due to agriculture land conversion. The species is currently listed as “Vulnerable” on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species. To expand genomic information, the study characterised its plastid genome (plastome) and conducted genome comparative and phylogenetic analyses with other selected species of Malvaceae. The quadripartite-structured plastome was 161 750 bp long and contained 83 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 37 tRNA genes, and eight rRNA genes. The overall GC content was 36.3%. Repeat analyses revealed 49 large repeats and 205 simple sequence repeats. A high preference for A/U-ended amino acids was found. Eight and nine PCGs were positively selected when compared to Coelostegia griffithii Benth. & Hook.f. and Reevesia thyrsoidea Lindl., respectively. A notable degree of collinearity was identified between the plastomes of K. malayana and six selected taxa of Helicteroideae. The phylogenetic tree reconstruction based on the concatenated PCG dataset showed a nearly well-resolved relationship within Malvaceae, with K. malayana placed under the Helicteroideae clade. The genomic data will provide a basis for future studies on the genetic conservation, phylogenetics, and evolutionary patterns of Durioneae and Malvaceae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207