Perspectives on Cultural Competency and Black Canadians’ Access to Mental Health Care in Canada: A Thematic Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this research was to explore the extent to which cultural competency is practised within Canadian mental health care by mental health professionals with respect to Black Canadians and African Nova Scotians. In addition, the study sought to determine how to improve Canadian mental health care for inclusivity of Black Canadians. Design: Five adult participants were recruited, with recruitment criteria involving self-identification as either “African Nova Scotian” or “Black Canadian,” or as a mental health professional with experience working with these populations. Participants were interviewed in a one-to-one setting using a semi-structured interview guide. Results: A thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) yielded three superordinate themes and eight subordinate themes. The superordinate themes were “No Blacks Allowed,” “Bad Apples (Spoil the Bunch),” and “Intrinsic Understanding.” Taken together, the themes suggest that while participants recognized the importance of cultural awareness training and understanding, and indicated an interest in implementing mandatory cultural awareness training for mental health professionals, the implementation of cultural competency in the practice of the mental health system in Canada remains elusive. Conclusion: The findings were that Black Canadians and African Nova Scotians are experiencing barriers to their accessibility of mental health care in Canada. The barriers are related to a lack of cultural awareness from mental health professionals. The findings suggest that Canadian mental health care could benefit from the implementation of cultural competency training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".