MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402037858 · doi:10.15273/hpj.v4i1.11990

Fetus in Situ

2024· article· en· W4402037858 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. Denton Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthy Populations Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn situFetusGeologyEnvironmental scienceGeographyPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Fetus in Situ” is a traditional flat-stitch Métis beadwork piece by settler-Métis artist and medical student Jamie Thompson. The piece measures 10.3 x 8.5cm and is handmade with size 15, 11, and 10 Czech seed beads, depicting a Black fetus with their head within a pelvic bone, about to be born. It considers the structural inequities that Indigenous, Black, and other people of the global majority (PGM) face in Canadian healthcare and in medical imagery. Considering that 30 percent of Canada’s population is non-white and encounters significant social barriers to healthcare access, the representation of non-white skin tones in only 4.5 percent of medical textbooks’ illustrations fails to represent a diversified population (Louie & Wilkes, 2018). In obstetrics specifically, Black women face a three-fold higher risk of death in pregnancy or childbirth compared to their white peers, and there is a studied need for anti-Black racism training and Black healthcare provider representation in obstetrics, a discipline which was founded on experimentation upon Black slaves (Statistics Canada, 2022., CDC, 2024). Click on the PDF link under the image for the full description.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1140.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthy Populations JournalSame topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207