Experimental constraints on barium isotope fractionation during adsorption–desorption reactions: Implications for weathering and erosion tracer applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Constraining the processes that fractionate barium isotopes is essential for utilising barium isotope ratios as environmental tracers. Barium concentration measurements from soils, rivers, and estuaries demonstrate that adsorption–desorption reactions significantly influence the distribution of fluid–mobile barium at the Earth’s surface, potentially driving isotopic fractionation. To quantify the direction and magnitude of isotopic fractionation resulting from these reactions, a riverine and an estuarine series of batch experiments were conducted using environmentally important adsorbent minerals and surface waters. Himalayan river sediment and water samples were used to validate the experimental results. Adsorption–desorption reactions were found to be rapid, relative to the average transit time of sediment and water in catchments, and largely reversible. The direction and magnitude of isotopic fractionation in the riverine experiment series were consistent with the riverine field samples (preferential adsorption of the lighter isotopes). The reaction rate, reversibility, and magnitude of isotopic fractionation were found to depend primarily on the mineral. Experiments performed with iron oxyhydroxides (goethite and ferrihydrite) resulted in a greater degree of fractionation compared to clay minerals (kaolinite and montmorillonite). Estuarine experiments, designed to simulate sediment passage through a salinity gradient, demonstrated a high degree of reversibility, with 77% to 94% of adsorbed barium desorbed upon the addition of seawater to freshwater-equilibrated clay minerals. The results of the estuarine experiments suggest that barium isotope ratios measured in marine paleo-archives (e.g., corals) will reflect both the adsorbed and dissolved freshwater barium inputs to the ocean. The combined findings of this study indicate that the chemical and isotopic behaviour of barium differs from more conventional group 1 and 2 metal isotope systems due to a significant proportion of barium released from bedrock dissolution partitioning to mineral surfaces, rapid reaction rates between fluid–mobile phases, and a high degree of reaction reversibility. Consequently, riverine barium isotope ratios are likely to provide unique insights into the complex array of terrestrial weathering and erosion processes that sustain life on Earth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".