Trabecular meshwork cell differentiation in response to collagen and TGFβ-2 spatial interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is currently the most prevalent cause of irreversible blindness globally. To date, few in vitro models that can faithfully recapitulate the complex architecture of the trabecular meshwork (TM) and the specialised trabecular meshwork cell (TMC) characteristics that are local to the structurally opposing regions. This study aimed to investigate the parameters that govern TMC phenotype by adapting the extracellular matrix structure to mimic the juxtacanalicular tissue (JCT) region of the TM. Initially, TMC phenotypic characteristics were investigated within type I collagen matrices of controlled fiber density and anisotropy, generated through confined plastic compression (PC). Notably, PC-collagen presented biophysical cues that induced JCT cellular characteristics (elastin, α-β-Crystallin protein expression, cytoskeletal remodelling, increased mesenchymal markers and JCT-specific genetic markers). In parallel, a pathological mesenchymal phenotype associated with POAG was induced through localised transforming growth factor -beta 2 (TGFβ-2) exposure. This resulted in a profile of alternative mesenchymal states (fibroblast/smooth muscle or myofibroblast) displayed by the TMC in vitro. Overall, the study provides an advanced insight into the biophysical cues that modulate TMC fate, inducing a JCT-specific phenotype and transient mesenchymal characteristics that reflect healthy and pathological scenarios. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness, with a lack of long-term efficacy within current drug candidates. Reliable trabecular meshwork (TM) in vitro models will be critical for enhancing the fields understanding of healthy and disease states for pre-clinical testing. Trabecular meshwork cells (TMCs) display heterogeneity throughout the hierarchical TM, however our understanding into recapitulating these phenotypes in vitro, remains elusive. This study hypothesizes the importance of specific matrix/growth factor spatial stimuli in governing TMCs phenotype. By emulating certain biophysical/biochemical in vivo parameters, we introduce an advanced profile of distinct TMC phenotypic states, reflecting healthy and disease scenarios. A notion that has not be stated prior and a fundamental consideration for future 3D TM in vitro modelling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".