MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402040846 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3452633

PiPCS: Perspective Independent Point Cloud Simplifier for Complex 3D Indoor Scenes

2024· article· en· W4402040846 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Ebrahimi, Stephen Czarnuch

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Computer sciencePoint cloudCloud computingPoint (geometry)Computer graphics (images)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometryOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of commercially accessible depth sensors has driven the widespread adoption of 3D data, offering substantial benefits across diverse applications, ranging from human activity recognition to augmented reality. However, indoor environments present significant challenges for 3D computer vision applications, particularly in cluttered and dynamic scenes where background bounding surfaces hinder the detection and analysis of foreground objects. We introduce a novel perspective-independent point cloud simplifier (PiPCS) for complex 3D indoor scenes. PiPCS streamlines 3D computer vision workflows by contextually segmenting and subtracting background bounding surfaces and preserving segmented foreground objects within indoor scenes, effectively reducing the size of indoor point clouds and enhancing 3D indoor scene perception. Methodologically, we use estimated surface normals to intelligently divide an input point cloud into distinct zones, which are then split into multiple distinct parallel clusters. Next, we find the largest plane in each cluster and sort the fitted planes within each zone based on their distance along the zone’s normal vector to identify the bounding surfaces. Finally, we segment the 3D background, simplify the point cloud by employing a voxel-based background subtraction technique, and segment 3D foreground objects via a cluster-based segmentation approach. We evaluated PiPCS on the Stanford S3DIS dataset and our own challenging dataset, achieving average values of 97.08% for specificity and 91.27% for F1 score on the S3DIS dataset and size reductions averaging 74.11% overall. Our experimental and evaluation results demonstrate that PiPCS robustly simplifies and reduces the size of unorganized indoor point clouds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topic3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207