MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402055258 · doi:10.1079/9781800623279.0018

<i>Contarinia nasturtii</i>(Kieffer), Swede Midge / Cécidomyie du chou-fleur and<i>Contarinia brassicola</i>Sinclair, Canola Flower Midge / Cécidomyie des fleurs du canola (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)

2024· book-chapter· fr· W4402055258 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angela E. Gradish, Boyd A. Mori, Paul K. Abram, Tim Haye, Sébastien Boquel, Rebecca H. Hallett

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCecidomyiidaeCanolaMidgeBiologyHorticultureAgronomyBotanyGall

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contarinia nasturtii , the swede midge, is an invasive pest of vegetables and oilseed crops in the family Brassicacea. Larval feeding by swede midge damages the growing points of the host plant and can result in significant yield loss in both vegetable and canola crops. To date, swede midge is not established in western Canada, but a close relative, Contarinia brassicola , the canola flower midge, is widespread on the prairies (i.e., Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta) and is present in Ontario as well. Economic damage associated with C. brassicola appears to be rare. Foreign exploration for potential biological control agents of swede midge was conducted in Europe, where parasitoids were observed parasitizing swede midge larvae, but these species were not sufficiently host specific to justify further investigation for importation biological control. Sampling in western Canada has revealed that at least two parasitoids parasitize C. brassicola ; these species are likely undescribed. The chapter reviews the management and status of biological control research for both midge species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCABI eBooksSame topicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207