MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402057774 · doi:10.1061/9780784485590.002

Corrosion Management at SaskEnergy: 84 Semi-Deep Wells for Impressed Current CP Systems

2024· article· en· W4402057774 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Buksa, Marc Blouin, Leah E. Newman, Alan L. Bair

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionCurrent (fluid)Cathodic protectionMaterials scienceComputer scienceMetallurgyEngineeringElectrical engineeringElectrochemistryChemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Engineers and construction supervisors provided corrosion construction supervision and direct labor during the installation of multiple cathodic protection (CP) systems for several kilometers of gas transmission and distribution pipelines across the Province of Saskatchewan. The scope of work included the supply and installation of 84 vertical semi-deep (less than 50 ft) cathodic protection ground beds at 27 sites across Saskatchewan. Labor, equipment, sub-contractors, and materials were supplied to install the semi-deep ground beds. The purpose and objectives of the project were as follows: (1) To perform preventive maintenance (upgrade/replacement) of existing aging ground beds to ensure continuous and uninterrupted operation of the impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) systems. (2) To prevent unexpected ground bed failure due to complete consumption of the ground bed anode material. (3) To relocate an ICCP system to a road allowance to ensure that the ground bed is not disturbed due to vehicular movement or traffic over the existing ground bed, which could subsequently lead to the ground bed’s failure. (4) To install new ICCP systems on new pipelines to provide cathodic protection on the subject pipelines. (5) To ensure improved soil-side corrosion control on the respective assets due to improved ICCP systems operation. The team reviewed Issued For Construction (IFC) documents and executed all construction work in accordance with the IFC documents and client specifications. The team reviewed project documentation to determine whether any changes could be implemented without affecting project quality and identified trade-offs in material selection and construction procedures that resulted in reduced material cost and ensured that construction was completed within schedule.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207