MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

64 COVID-19 policies and inflicted violence injuries among children and youth in Canada

2024· article· en· W4402059004 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah A. Richmond, Alexia Medeiros, Alex Zheng, Alison Macpherson, Fahra Rajabali, Breanna Nelson, Ian Pike

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInjury Epidemiology and Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaYork UniversityPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Medical emergencyCriminologyPolitical scienceMedicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background In March 2020, lockdown measures were implemented to curb the spread of COVID-19 infection across Canada. This policy indirectly impacted several health outcomes, including inflicted violence injuries among children and youth. Anecdotally, an increase in cases was hypothesized due to changes in social and family dynamics due to the stay at home policies introduced. Objective The objective of this research was to examine the effect of the initial COVID-19 policy implemented in March 2020 in two provinces in Canada (Ontario, British Columbia). We aimed to describe the change in the number of violence-related hospitalizations among children and youth ages 0 – 19 years. Policy Analysis We used an interrupted time series analysis to examine the change in the number of violence-related hospitalizations before the pandemic (previous to March 2020) with those during the pandemic (after March 2020) in both provinces. Our model examined if implementation of the policy impacted age groups (0–9, 10–19), and sex (male, female), differently. Policy Implications There was a significant, 35% decrease in the rate of hospitalizations (RR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.52, 0.82) after implementing lockdown policies in the province of Ontario, after controlling for relevant covariates. There was no discernable change in the rate of violence injury hospitalizations in British Columbia. Finally, we report no significant change in hospitalizations by age group or sex when examining interaction effects of the policy. This policy analysis focused on an indirect health impact of lockdown measures on vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Conclusions There was a significant decrease in the rate of violence-related hospitalizations at implementation of the first COVID-19 policy in Ontario, but this was not observed in British Columbia. We hypothesize that a significant number of injuries did not present to hospital in Ontario during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic due to the implementation of lockdown measures and fear of COVID-19 infection. Increased surveillance mechanisms to capture and address the number of unreported violence cases in children and youth is required during emergency public health crises.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstractsSame topicInjury Epidemiology and PreventionFrench-language works237,207