MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402075506 · doi:10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.16.379

Exploring Organization of Subject Curriculum for Improvement of Coherence between General Guidelines and Subject Curriculum

2024· article· en· W4402075506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jiyoung Yoon, Jung-Duk Ohn

Bibliographic record

VenueKorean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Research and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumCurriculum mappingSubject (documents)Emergent curriculumMathematics educationCurriculum theoryCurriculum-based measurementCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Computer scienceCurriculum developmentPedagogyPsychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives The purpose of this study is to propose the organization of subject curriculum to support a learner-centered curriculum design and practice for competency development, while ensuring coherence between general guidelines and subject curriculum. Methods Analyzing the teaching, learning, and assessment guidelines of the 2022 revised curriculum framework, we derived the key points that should be considered in the design of teachers' teaching and learning activities. In light of this, documents on the Canada Ontario curriculum (Language, Mathematics, SSHG, Science and Technology) were analyzed. Based on this, we analyzed and summarized the organization of subject curriculum to help design teaching and learning. Results The 2022 revised curriculum framework emphasized ‘connection within and between subjects, connection with life, learning about inquiry methods, active participation of students, and assessment as learning’. The subject curriculum of Ontario provides support for connection within and across subjects, application of learning content in real-world contexts, guidance on procedural knowledge and thinking processes, posing essential questions related to learning content, and supporting students' reflection on learning through curriculum expectations, strands, concepts and big ideas, processes, assessment and evaluation of student achievement, and optional teacher supports. Conclusions Based on these results, it was confirmed that it is possible to enhance coherence between general guidelines and subject curriculum and support teachers’ curriculum design and implementation through the establishment of a curriculum document framework. In the national curriculum development, it was suggested that there is a need for a curriculum design that systematizes content elements within the categories of process and skills, presents performance standards, and demonstrates the connection of knowledge within and across subjects according to the characteristics of the curriculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKorean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And InstructionSame topicEducational Research and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207