INFLUENCE OF THE WATER QUALITY OF LAKE TOHO LOCATED IN THE MONO DEPARTMENT, SOUTHWEST BENIN, BY GLYPHOSATE AND METALS (COPPER, ZINC, LEAD, CADMIUM)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to assess the pollution status of the waters in Lake Toho, water samples were collected and analyzed using the spectrophotometer. Researched elements such as glyphosate are in high concentrations in the lake waters. The same goes for Trace Metal Elements such as copper, zinc, lead, cadmium in the waters of the said lake. The metal contents are beyond the tolerable limit by the Canadian standard following the Criteria for the protection of Aquatic Life according to Chronic effects (CVAC: 0.0085 mg.L-1 for copper and lead, 0.11 mg.L-1 for zinc, 0.0093 mg.L-1 for cadmium). Likewise, the copper, zinc and lead contents (during the long dry season and end of the long rainy season) recorded exceed the same standard according to the Criteria for the protection of Aquatic Life according to Acute effects (CVAA: 0.012 mg.L-1 for copper, 0.11 mg.L-1 for zinc and 0.22 mg.L-1 for lead). These levels of herbicide and metals present would contribute to the toxicity of the waters of Lake Toho and constitute a green threat for the aquatic organisms present in the said lake. It is urgent to put in place a management and control system for actions around the lake.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it