Acrylamide Mitigation in French Fries: The Effects of the Surface-to-Volume Ratio of Potato Strips and Timing of In-season Nitrogen Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acrylamide formed in French fries during high-temperature cooking may pose a risk to human health. Here, we found that increasing the cross section size from 0.8 to 1 cm lowered the acrylamide content in French fries from Russet Burbank, Ranger Russet, and Shepody by 63, 55, and 59%, respectively. A further increase in strip thickness from 1 to 1.2 cm decreased the acrylamide content by 64% in Shepody but not in the other cultivars. In all but one instance, the acrylamide contents correlated more strongly with reducing sugars. We also evaluated the impact of different N fertilization strategies on the accumulation of free asparagine and reducing sugars in fresh tubers and acrylamide formation in French fries from the cultivar Russet Burbank, grown over two seasons in southern Alberta, Canada. Both acrylamide formation and its precursors were significantly more influenced by heat stress and tuber chemical maturity than by different fertilization strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".