Acrylamide Mitigation in French Fries: The Effects of the Surface-to-Volume Ratio of Potato Strips and Timing of In-season Nitrogen Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acrylamide formed in French fries during high-temperature cooking may pose a risk to human health. Here, we found that increasing the cross section size from 0.8 to 1 cm lowered the acrylamide content in French fries from Russet Burbank, Ranger Russet, and Shepody by 63, 55, and 59%, respectively. A further increase in strip thickness from 1 to 1.2 cm decreased the acrylamide content by 64% in Shepody but not in the other cultivars. In all but one instance, the acrylamide contents correlated more strongly with reducing sugars. We also evaluated the impact of different N fertilization strategies on the accumulation of free asparagine and reducing sugars in fresh tubers and acrylamide formation in French fries from the cultivar Russet Burbank, grown over two seasons in southern Alberta, Canada. Both acrylamide formation and its precursors were significantly more influenced by heat stress and tuber chemical maturity than by different fertilization strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it