MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402090523 · doi:10.21275/sr24828180619

Post Operative Cognitive Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgeries - An Institutional Study

2024· article· en· W4402090523 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sanjeev Pandian R, Renjith Singh R, x Thangasaravanan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionMedicinePostoperative cognitive dysfunctionPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Post Operative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) is a less known but serious complication after any major surgery especially after open cardiac surgeries. Cognitive decline after major surgeries can be transient. But the impact of POCD in the post operative recovery is troublesome which makes it a topic of interest. POCD can range from impaired memory, attention, learning, executive function to impairment of psychomotor dexterity. It can also be accompanied by behavioural changes. POCD by definition requires both pre-and postoperative psychometric tests. Though there are several studies on POCD worldwide, a reliable test has not been identified to diagnose POCD. Aim: The aim of this study is to establish the incidence of POCD and devise a reliable methodical test to diagnose POCD with available resources at Dept of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Govt Stanley medical college hospital. Settings and Design: Department of cardio thoracic surgery, retrospective study Methods and Material: Inclusion Criteria: All patients who underwent elective open cardiac surgeries in department of CTS in Stanley medical college Exclusion Criteria: 1. All patients who had previous cognitive disorders 2. Patients with psychiatric illnesses 3. Patients with preexisting cerebral dysfunction, pulmonary, renal insufficiency SAMPLE SIZE : 100 PATIENTS DURATION : Cases operated from 2020 to 2023 Statistical analysis used: SAS Results: 1.Incidence of POCD is 46% at the time of discharge, 29% at six weeks and 18% at six months after surgery 2.Montreal cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a preoperative screening test and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) as a post operative confirmatory test are reliable tests in our setup 3.Incidence of POCD is higher with CABG ON PUMP, followed by other open cardiac cases such as valvular replacements especially ones involving aortic valves. Conclusions: POCD is a serious complication of cardiac surgery. The incidence of POCD is the highest at the time of discharge which gradually decreases over the period of time. MoCA and WCST are useful tests for cognition where in the patients are subjected to simple methods of cognitive functional analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207