MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402094962 · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102972

SG-Fusion: A swin-transformer and graph convolution-based multi-modal deep neural network for glioma prognosis

2024· article· en· W4402094962 on OpenAlexafffund
Minghan Fu, Ming Fang, Rayyan Azam Khan, Bo Liao, Zhanli Hu, Fang‐Xiang Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence in Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkDeep learningMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Data mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of morphological attributes extracted from histopathological images and genomic data holds significant importance in advancing tumor diagnosis, prognosis, and grading. Histopathological images are acquired through microscopic examination of tissue slices, providing valuable insights into cellular structures and pathological features. On the other hand, genomic data provides information about tumor gene expression and functionality. The fusion of these two distinct data types is crucial for gaining a more comprehensive understanding of tumor characteristics and progression. In the past, many studies relied on single-modal approaches for tumor diagnosis. However, these approaches had limitations as they were unable to fully harness the information from multiple data sources. To address these limitations, researchers have turned to multi-modal methods that concurrently leverage both histopathological images and genomic data. These methods better capture the multifaceted nature of tumors and enhance diagnostic accuracy. Nonetheless, existing multi-modal methods have, to some extent, oversimplified the extraction processes for both modalities and the fusion process. In this study, we presented a dual-branch neural network, namely SG-Fusion. Specifically, for the histopathological modality, we utilize the Swin-Transformer structure to capture both local and global features and incorporate contrastive learning to encourage the model to discern commonalities and differences in the representation space. For the genomic modality, we developed a graph convolutional network based on gene functional and expression level similarities. Additionally, our model integrates a cross-attention module to enhance information interaction and employs divergence-based regularization to enhance the model's generalization performance. Validation conducted on glioma datasets from the Cancer Genome Atlas unequivocally demonstrates that our SG-Fusion model outperforms both single-modal methods and existing multi-modal approaches in both survival analysis and tumor grading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial Intelligence in MedicineSame topicAI in cancer detectionFrench-language works237,207