MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402096503 · doi:10.1101/2024.08.30.610378

Hungry catfish – effect of prey availability on movement dynamics of a top predator

2024· preprint· en· W4402096503 on OpenAlexaff
Milan Říha, Rubén Rabaneda‐Bueno, Lukáš Vejřík, Ivan Jarić, Marie Prchalová, Marek Šmejkal, Martin Čech, Vladislav Draštík, Petr Blabolil, Michaela Holubová, Tomáš Jůza, Karl Øystein Gjelland, Zuzana Sajdlová, Luboš Kočvara, Michal Tušer, Jiří Peterka

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredatorPredationCatfishMovement (music)Dynamics (music)FisheryApex predatorFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyBiologyPsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The availability and spatial distribution of prey determines the energetic costs of predators foraging and largely drives their space use, activity level and foraging timing. Consequently, predators in ecosystems with different prey availability and distribution should adjust their movement patterns to optimise their foraging success in order to maximise efficiency. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of a top predator, European catfish ( Silurus glanis ), to adapt its space use, temporal activity and diet patterns in environments with varying prey density and distribution, and to examine the consequences for the catfish’s body growth. Catfish activity, tracked with high-resolution acoustic telemetry positioning systems deployed in two oligotrophic lakes with limited fish prey and one eutrophic reservoir with abundant fish prey, showed clear differences in their spatial and foraging behaviour. In oligotrophic, prey-poor lakes, catfish showed larger space use, altered diurnal activity patterns, reduced use of the open water, increased variability in inter- and intra-individual space use and had a more diverse diet compared to their conspecifics in the eutrophic, prey-rich reservoir. However, despite these behavioural alterations the reduced food availability in prey-poor lakes ultimately led to a reduced catfish growth, as these behavioural changes could not fully compensate for the lower prey fish abundance. The study showed that top predators can combine different behavioural mechanisms and individual strategies to adapt to different ecological contexts. The observed ability of catfish to optimize activity, space use and diet highlights the evolutionary need to maximise foraging efficiency and overall fitness in different habitats, giving catfish a significant competitive advantage. Such competitive abilities are prerequisites for the actual catfish success as an invasive species within a Europe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→