MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402096712 · doi:10.1101/2024.08.30.610185

A wheat tandem kinase and NLR pair confers resistance to multiple fungal pathogens

2024· preprint· en· W4402096712 on OpenAlexaff
Ping Lu, Gaohua Zhang, Jing Li, Zhen Gong, Gaojie Wang, Lingli Dong, Huaizhi Zhang, Guanghao Guo, Min Su, Yueming Wang, Keyu Zhu, Qiuhong Wu, Yongxing Chen, Miaomiao Li, Beibei Li, Wenling Li, Lei Dong, Yikun Hou, Xuejia Cui, H. Y. Fu, Dan Qiu, Chengguo Yuan, Hongjie Li, Jian‐Min Zhou, Guan-Zhu Han, Yuhang Chen, Zhiyong Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Genetics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyResistance (ecology)TandemBiotechnologyAgronomyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recently discovered tandem kinase proteins (TKPs) are pivotal to the innate immune systems of cereal plants, yet how they initiate plant immune responses remains unclear. This report identifies the wheat protein WTN1, a non-canonical NLR receptor featuring tandem NB-ARC domains, as crucial for WTK3- mediated disease resistance. Both WTK3 and its allelic variant Rwt4, known for conferring resistance to wheat powdery mildew and blast respectively, are capable of recognizing the blast effector PWT4, and activate WTN1 to form calcium-permeable channels, akin to ZAR1 and Sr35. This study unveils a unique plant defense mechanism wherein TKPs and associated NLRs operate as “sensor-executor” pairs against fungal pathogens. Additionally, evolutionary analyses reveal a co-evolutionary trajectory of the TKP-NLR module, highlighting their synergistic role in triggering plant immunity. One Sentence Summary An ancient synergistic TKP-NLR pair triggers innate immunity for multiple disease resistance in wheat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207