Neoproterozoic Ridge Subduction Beneath South China Craton: TTG Suites of Kangding Complex in Western Yangtze Block and its Geochemistry Characteristics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT A multidisciplinary study involving field investigation, petrographic, geochronology, and whole-rock geochemical data is presented for TTG suites in the western Yangtze Block. In this paper, we compiled element geochemistry data that we obtained from our previous works for China Geological Survey Projects and presented the zircon U-Pb age and the whole-rock elemental compositions of the Na-rich TTG rocks to provide constraints on the origin of the Neoproterozoic magmatism in the western Yangtze Block. The studied rocks show a calc-alkaline trend. They are comparable in whole-rock chemistry to Archean TTG suites from Finland, Labrador, India, Zimbabwe, Brazil, and Ontario, as well as the modern calc-alkaline magmas such as volcanic rocks in the Kastamonu area of Northern Turkey and the Cenozoic andesitedacite-rhyolite suites from the North American Cordillera. Zircon U-Pb age shows the crystallization age of the plagioclase gneiss from Kangding Complex is 772.4 ± 6.9 Ma. The granodiorites are more enriched in LREEs but depleted in HREEs, showed strong negative Eu anomalies, and are characterized by fractionated LREE, flat HREE, and depletion of high-field-strength trace elements (HFSE) relative to normal mid-ocean basalts (N-MORB). However, most trondhjemites, all tonalites, and all quartz diorites have no Eu anomalies. Trace element distribution patterns for all samples show typical island arc signatures with relative enrichment in LILE and depletion in HFSE like Nb and Ta. We assume that the TTG suites were derived from melting of metabasalt in a subducted slab heated by a slab window, which provides further support for a Neoproterozoic intra-oceanic ridge subduction along the western margin of Yangtze Block.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".