Associations between 6-minute walk distance and physiologic measures and clinical outcomes in myositis-associated interstitial lung disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is a simple test widely used to assess sub-maximal exercise capacity in chronic respiratory diseases. We explored the relationship of 6-min walk distance (6MWD) with measurements of physiological, clinical, radiographic measures in patients with myositis-associated interstitial lung disease (MA-ILD). METHOD: We analysed data from the Abatacept in Myositis Associated Interstitial Lung Disease (Attack My-ILD) study, a 48-week multicentre randomized trial of patients with anti-synthetase antibodies and active MA-ILD. 6MWD, forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity (DLCO), high-resolution CT and various physician-/patient-reported outcome measures were obtained during the trial. Spearman's correlations and repeated-measures analysis with linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the associations between 6MWD and various physiologic, clinical and radiographic parameters both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. RESULTS: Twenty participants with a median age of 57 years, 55% male and 85% white were analysed. Baseline 6MWD did not associate with baseline pulmonary function tests. Repeated-measures analysis showed 6MWD over time associated with FVC over time, but not with DLCO. 6MWD over time also correlated with University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath questionnaire dyspnoea score, Borg scores, as well as global disease activity and muscle strength over time. Emotional role functioning, vitality, general health and physical functioning scores by Short Form 36 also correlated with 6MWD over time. CONCLUSIONS: Exploratory work in a small cohort of MA-ILD demonstrated 6MWD over time associated with parallel changes in FVC and patient-reported outcomes of dyspnoea, but not with DLCO. Larger studies are needed to validate the reliability, responsiveness and utility of the 6MWT in MA-ILD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03215927.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".