MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402129300 · doi:10.1007/s11063-024-11681-2

Within-Class Constraint Based Multi-task Autoencoder for One-Class Classification

2024· article· en· W4402129300 on OpenAlexaff
Guojie Xie, Tianlei Wang, Dekang Liu, Wandong Zhang, Xiaoping Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueNeural Processing Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of ZhejiangNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAutoencoderComputational intelligenceClass (philosophy)Constraint (computer-aided design)Task (project management)Artificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningMathematicsArtificial neural networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autoencoders (AEs) have attracted much attention in one-class classification (OCC) based unsupervised anomaly detection. The AEs aim to learn the unity features on targets without involving anomalies and thus the targets are expected to obtain smaller reconstruction errors than anomalies. However, AE-based OCC algorithms may suffer from the overgeneralization of AE and fail to detect anomalies that have similar distributions to target data. To address these issues, a novel within-class constraint based multi-task AE (WC-MTAE) is proposed in this paper. WC-MTAE consists of two different task: one for reconstruction and the other for the discrimination-based OCC task. In this way, the encoder is compelled by the OCC task to learn the more compact encoded feature distribution for targets when minimizing OCC loss. Meanwhile, the within-class scatter based penalty term is constructed to further regularize the encoded feature distribution. The aforementioned two improvements enable the unsupervised anomaly detection by the compact encoded features, thereby addressing the issue of the overgeneralization in AEs. Comparisons with several state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms on several non-image datasets and an image dataset CIFAR10 are provided where the WC-MTAE is conducted on 3 different network structures including the multilayer perception (MLP), LeNet-type convolution network and full convolution neural network. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed WC-MTAE. The source code would be available in future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeural Processing LettersSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207