Insect metamorphosis is regulated differently between sexes by members of a microRNA cluster
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Insects comprise the majority of all described animal species and dominate the terrestrial habitats. The evolution of insect metamorphosis played a profound role in their successful adaptation and radiation. Insect metamorphosis is dependent on hormones ecdysteroids and sesquiterpenoids such as juvenile hormone. Despite the fact there are genuine differences between sexes during insect metamorphosis which facilitate their successful mating, how such sexual dimorphism in metamorphosis is being controlled is poorly known. We first generated transcriptomic profiles of male and female flies in late larvae and early pupae stages. Using a combination of genome-wide prediction and in vitro dual-luciferase validations, members of a microRNA cluster miR-277/34 were found to potentially regulate the neuropeptide receptor (AstC-R1) that when activated inhibits the sesquiterpenoid pathway and a juvenile hormone-dependent transcription factor (Kr-h1) in fly Drosophila melanogaster. Loss-of-function mutants were created deleting either miR-277 or miR-34, and expression levels of both AstC-R1 and Kr-h1 as well as ecdysteroid and sesquiterpenoid hormone titres were altered. Further comparison of transcriptomes of the late larvae and early pupae of both sexes revealed differential gene pathways being regulated by members of miR-277/34 between sexes during metamorphosis. This study highlights how members of a microRNA cluster control hormonal and developmental gene pathways in different sexes of insects during metamorphosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it