N/O dual coordination of cobalt single atom for fast kinetics sodium‐sulfur batteries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Room‐temperature sodium‐sulfur batteries are promising grid‐scale energy storage systems owing to their high energy density and low cost. However, their application is limited by the dissolution of long‐chain sodium polysulfides and slow redox kinetics. To address these issues, a cobalt single‐atom catalyst with N/O dual coordination was derived from a metal‐organic framework precursor (denoted as Co–N 2 O 2 /MOFc) for sulfur storage. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that, compared with the Co–N 4 structure, the introduction of oxygen atoms can further tune the d‐electron density of Co atoms via the coordinative effect, which enhances d‐p hybridization after Na 2 S x adsorption on Co–N 2 O 2 /MOFc. This leads to higher adsorption energy for Na 2 S x , lower Gibbs free energy for the rate‐limiting process and a decreased Na 2 S decomposition energy barrier, thereby promoting the polysulfide conversion reaction kinetics. When used as a sulfur host, the Co–N 2 O 2 /MOFc/S cathode exhibits excellent performance with a capacity of 590 mAh·g −1 (983 mAh·g −1 normalized by the sulfur mass) after 100 cycles at 0.1 A·g −1 and an excellent rate capability of 350 mAh·g −1 at 10 A·g −1 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it