Post-stroke delirium is associated with cognitive and psychiatric symptoms over time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Delirium, an acute and fluctuating disturbance of attention, cognition, and consciousness, may occur in the acute phase of stroke. Research on long-term outcomes of stroke patients experiencing delirium is limited. Our previous findings suggested that patients experiencing acute delirium had increased cognitive and psychiatric symptoms in the chronic phase. In the current study, this was further examined in a larger sample, including measures of global cognition, as well as psychiatric symptoms. As part of the Nor-COAST study, 373 stroke patients were screened for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Patients were included in the study if they had available data from any of the follow-ups at three, 18 or 36 months, totaling 334 (44.6% women, mean (SD) age: 72.1 (12.5) years, 17 (5.1%) diagnosed with delirium). Global cognition was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Psychiatric symptoms were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q). Subscales of NPI-Q were used to measure specific psychiatric symptoms. Mixed-model linear regression was applied with MoCA, HADS, and NPI-Q, one at a time, as dependent variables. The independent variables were delirium, time as a categorical covariate, and their interaction. Mixed- model binary logistic regression was used to analyze differences in specific psychiatric symptoms. At three months, delirium was only significantly associated with a higher NPI-Q score (mean (SD) 2.9 (3.6) vs 1.4 (2.2)). At 18 and 36 months respectively, delirium was associated with a lower MoCA score (mean (SD) 19.7 (6.6) vs 24.3 (5.0), and 20.6 (7.6) vs 24.6 (4.8)), higher HADS anxiety symptoms (5.0 (4.3) vs 3.3 (3.3), and 5.9 (4.1) vs 3.4 (3.6)), higher HADS depression symptoms (7.2 (4.7) vs 3.4 (3.3), and 6.6 (5.1) vs 3.7 (3.7)), and higher NPI-Q score (2.4 (4.4) vs 1.7 (2.3), 2.6 (4.5) vs 1.0 (1.9)). Delirium significantly predicted the psychiatric symptoms hallucinations and agitation. Patients with delirium in the acute phase of stroke may be particularly vulnerable to developing cognitive and psychiatric symptoms in the chronic phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".