MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402131784 · doi:10.1093/dote/doae057.266

536. TUMOR-INFORMED “LIQUID BIOPSY” FOR ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA FROM MATCHED CANCER ORGANOID CULTURE

2024· article· en· W4402131784 on OpenAlexaff
Thaiane Rispoli, Premalatha Shathasivam, Niharikaa Aiyar, Jonathan Allen, Frances Alisson, Yvonne Bach, Eugenia Dakpo, A. Sundby, Gavin W. Wilson, Jonathan Yeung

Bibliographic record

VenueDiseases of the Esophagus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrganoidEsophageal adenocarcinomaEsophageal cancerBiopsyLiquid biopsyAdenocarcinomaCancerPathologyOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The absence of recurrent mutations in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) poses a challenge in detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma and may hinder the advancement of liquid biopsy methods. To address this, we cultured patient-derived EAC organoids (PDOs), speculating that they could serve as a guide for identifying ctDNA in the patient's blood samples. This approach aims to leverage organoids as a potential tool to overcome the complexity of identifying ctDNA in EAC, offering a promising avenue for refining liquid biopsy strategies in clinical practice. Methods PDOs were generated from EAC tumor tissue in Matrigel domes and expanded in suspension culture. To isolate mononucleosomes (147 bp), chromatin from PDOs was extracted and digested with micrococcal nuclease (MNase). Fragments larger than 147 bp were removed through size selection. MNase-sequencing was performed to generate a mutation map with preferential coverage of nucleosome-protected DNA for each sample. Matched whole genome sequencing of the tumor for each respective PDO sample was used as a control. Primers were designed for the identified mutations in nucleosome-protected DNA and used to amplify patient cfDNA for sequencing. Results DNA from five different PDOs were collected and MNase digested. MNase concentration and digestion time were optimized for each sample. MNase digestion produced mononucleosomes of approximately 147 bp for all samples. MNase-sequencing identified 24 mutations in peaks (mononucleosomes) in 24 genes, including known oncogenes. Among these were 16 missense, 2 frameshift, and 1 nonsense mutations, and 5 mutations in splice regions. To date, amplicons of expected size were detected by PCR for six genes using either total PDO DNA or normal cell-free DNA, confirming the detectability of these genes. PCR amplification using patient ctDNA and next-generation sequencing is ongoing. Conclusion These findings show that we are able to isolate and detect somatic mutations in nucleosomes from different PDOs, allowing us to generate a nucleosome SNV map for each sample. Preliminary data indicate these regions can be PCR amplified from normal cfDNA. Amplification and sequence verification of mutated regions from corresponding patient blood ctDNA is ongoing. The mapping of patient-specific variants will enable the development of targeted personalized PCR panels, aiding in recurrence prediction and enhancing drug screening accuracy. This advancement holds promise for early cancer detection and improving prognoses for individuals with EAC by addressing gaps in recurrence prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiseases of the EsophagusSame topicEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207