Early life seizures and olfactory communication in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Early life seizures (ELS) are commonly associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD); however, the exact role of ELS in the pathology is unknown. Prior studies have demonstrated social deficits, a core feature of ASD, following ELS; consequently, alterations in sensory modalities may contribute to the overall social deficits. Considering the speculated contribution of sensory deficit to social communication, we examined the developmental consequences of early postnatal kainic acid (KA)-induced seizures on olfactory preference and neural markers in the olfactory bulb in both male and female Sprague Dawley rats. METHODS: KA-induced seizures or saline was administered. Rats were then exposed to a series of biologically relevant scents including male scent, female scent, nest scent, and phenylethylamine during the juvenile period and again during adulthood. Alterations in sensory modalities were expected to be expressed via abnormal preference for certain scents and/or production of abnormal ultrasonic vocalizations in response to scents. The olfactory bulbs were also assessed for the biologically relevant markers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CAMKII). RESULTS: Our findings resulted in no significant differences in olfactory preference following ELS for juveniles or adults compared to controls. Similarly, there were no differences in GFAP expression or the ratio of phosphorylated CAMKII to CAMKII in either olfactory bulb. Interestingly, despite a lack of treatment differences, different scents were shown to elicit different responses in juvenile rats, yet these differences subsided in adulthood. SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, the results of this study suggest that olfaction does not contribute to socialization deficit following ELS within the KA model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".