MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402134444 · doi:10.1186/s12964-024-01796-3

RIPK1 inhibition mitigates neuroinflammation and rescues depressive-like behaviors in a mouse model of LPS-induced depression

2024· article· en· W4402134444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Communication and Signaling · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersShenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain ScienceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNeuroinflammationDepression (economics)Sickness behaviorRIPK1InflammationNeuroscienceMedicinePsychologyChemistryInternal medicineNecroptosisBiochemistryProgrammed cell death

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Depression is often linked to inflammation in the brain. Researchers have been exploring ways to reduce this inflammation to improve depression symptoms. One potential target is a protein called RIPK1, which is known to contribute to brain inflammation. However, it's unclear how RIPK1 influences depression. Our study aims to determine whether RIPK1 inhibition could alleviate neuroinflammation-associated depression and elucidate its underlying mechanisms. METHODS: To investigate our research objectives, we established a neuroinflammation mouse model by administering LPS. Behavioral and biochemical assessments were conducted on these mice. The findings were subsequently validated through in vitro experiments. RESULTS: . Remarkably, Necrostatin (Nec-1 S), a RIPK1 inhibitor, mitigated these changes. We further found altered expression and phosphorylation of eIF4E, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and synaptic proteins in hippocampal tissues, BV2, and N2a cells post-LPS treatment, which Nec-1 S also ameliorated. Importantly, eIF4E inhibition reversed some of the beneficial effects of Nec-1 S, suggesting a complex interaction between RIPK1 and eIF4E in LPS-induced neuroinflammation. Moreover, citronellol, a RIPK1 agonist, significantly altered eIF4E phosphorylation, indicating RIPK1's potential upstream regulatory role in eIF4E and its contribution to neuroinflammation-associated depression. CONCLUSION: These findings propose RIPK1 as a pivotal mediator in regulating neuroinflammation and neural plasticity, highlighting its significance as a potential therapeutic target for depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it