Cordotomy under general anesthesia for a pediatric palliative patient: illustrative case
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT)-guided cordotomy has been shown to be a safe and effective method for treating cancer pain in adults in a palliative care setting. Its effectiveness has been rarely reported in children. During cordotomy, patient feedback is considered essential. Unfortunately, in this report, the featured patient's age and demeanor precluded an awake cordotomy. The authors report the first case, to their knowledge, of percutaneous cordotomy with the patient under general anesthesia. OBSERVATIONS: An 11-year-old boy with osteosarcoma of the right pelvis presented with medically refractory unilateral nociceptive pain. The pain prevented ambulation, interfered with sleep, was the focus of his concern, and could not be relieved without sedation. A left percutaneous CT-guided cervical cordotomy while he was under general anesthesia was performed without complication and provided sufficient pain relief to allow ambulation and restorative sleep. Pain was no longer an issue for the patient and his family. LESSONS: CT-guided percutaneous cervical cordotomy can be accomplished in a pediatric patient under general anesthesia. The risks of cordotomy under general anesthesia without patient feedback must be weighed against the opportunity to improve palliative care. https://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/CASE2427.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it