Sex and disease regulate major histocompatibility complex class I expression in human lung epithelial cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) molecules present peptides to CD8+ T-cells for immunosurveillance of infection and cancer. Recent studies indicate lineage-specific heterogeneity in MHC I expression. While respiratory diseases rank among the leading causes of mortality, studies in mice have shown that lung epithelial cells (LECs) express the lowest levels of MHC I in the lung. This study aims to answer three questions: (i) Do human LECs express low levels of MHC I? (ii) Is LEC MHC I expression modulated in chronic respiratory diseases? (iii) Which factors regulate MHC I levels in human LECs? We analyzed human LECs from parenchymal explants using single-cell RNA sequencing and immunostaining. We confirmed low constitutive MHC I expression in human LECs, with significant upregulation in chronic respiratory diseases. We observed a sexual dimorphism, with males having higher MHC I levels under steady-state conditions, likely due to differential redox balance. Our study unveils the complex interplay between MHC I expression, sex, and respiratory disease. Since MHC I upregulation contributes to the development of immunopathologies in other models, we propose that it may have a similar impact on chronic lung disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".