Remote Ischemic Conditioning Improves Cardiovascular Function in Heart Failure Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Recently, it has been shown that remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) can be used as a healthy regimen to reverse disease and aging. With this in mind, we are studying the consequences of RIC on cardiovascular function in heart failure patients. Methods: Forty patients with stable heart failure were prospectively enlisted and randomly divided into RIC (n = 20) and control (n = 20) groups. The RIC protocol consists of a 3-min inflation and then deflation of the blood pressure cuff attached to the upper arm to produce transient ischemia of the arm. RIC treatment was performed once daily for 1 year. NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial and ventricular dimensions were all assessed in two groups. Results: RIC was well tolerated. After 1 year of treatment, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improved and LVEF showed a significant increase from 37.11% to 52.44% (P < 0.0001). Additionally, the dimensions of the left atrium (from 50.55 to 43.25 mm) and ventricle (from 53.04 to 50.15 mm) were significantly reduced in the RIC group. Conclusion: This study suggests that 1 year of RIC treatment as a health strategy could improve cardiovascular function in heart failure patients, leading to its widespread use in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".