MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402147452 · doi:10.14740/cr1692

Does Sinus Rhythm Restoration in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation Have Acute Hemodynamic Benefits?

2024· article· en· W4402147452 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tomo Komaki, Noriyuki Mohri, Akihito Ideishi, Kohei Tashiro, N Koyanagi, Shin‐ichiro Miura, Masahiro Ogawa

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSinus rhythmAtrial fibrillationCardiologyHemodynamicsCardioversionInternal medicinePulmonary veinVeinAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Although the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have long-term benefits, few studies have investigated the acute hemodynamic benefits immediately after SR restoration. Therefore, we investigated whether hemodynamic changes occurred in the first few minutes after cardioversion from AF to SR. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 145 patients with AF and divided them into a pre-AF group comprising patients in whom SR was restored by electrical cardioversion during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; n = 74) and a control group comprising patients who were in SR throughout the procedure (n = 71). The pre-AF group was subdivided into subgroups according to AF classification (paroxysmal AF (PAF), persistent AF (PerAF), and long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF)) and into quartiles based on the AF-heart rate (HR). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and left atrial pressure (LAP) were measured immediately after transseptal puncture (pre-measurement) and before withdrawal from the left atrium after PVI (post-measurement). The changes in MAP and LAP between the pre- and post-measurement (¦¤MAP and ¦¤LAP) were calculated by subtracting the pre-measurements (MAP pre and LAP pre ) from the post-measurements (MAP post and LAP post ). Results: In the pre-AF group, the time from cardioversion to post-measurement was 19 ¡À 16 min. When ¦¤MAP and ¦¤LAP were compared with the control group, ¦¤MAP was significantly smaller (4.9 ¡À 17.8 vs. 11.0 ¡À 14.2 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.025), and ¦¤LAP was not significantly different between the groups. In the subgroup analyses, although ¦¤LAP was not significantly different among AF types, ¦¤MAP was significantly increased in the PAF group compared to the PerAF and LSPAF groups (24.0 ¡À 18.5 vs. 3.1 ¡À 16.8 and 4.5 ¡À 18.1 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.042). The HR pre in the quartiles with the lowest, second, third, and highest AF-HR were approximately 58, 74, 86, and 109 beats per minute (bpm), respectively. The ¦¤LAP and ¦¤MAP were not significantly different among the AF-HR quartile groups. Conclusions: In patients with PAF, atrial contractions may resume quickly, which leads to hemodynamic improvement immediately after SR restoration. As for AF-HR, there was no significant impairment of ventricular diastolic filling at approximately < 109 bpm. Cardiol Res. 2024;15(4):298-308 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1692

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ResearchSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207