MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Learning-Based Deterministic Scheduling for TSN and 5G Integrated Networks

2024· article· en· W4402158843 on OpenAlexaff
Ruibin Guo, Dong Yang, Weiting Zhang, Qing-yu Cai, Hongke Zhang, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Distributed computingComputer networkMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integration of the fifth-generation mobile communication technology (5G) into time-sensitive networking (TSN) was first proposed in the 3GPP Release 16. However, this conceptual proposal lacks of detailed designs to guarantee bounded latency and high reliability of this integration. In this paper, we study a deterministic scheduling problem for TSN-5G integrated networks in industrial Internet of things (IIoT) scenarios, in which a unified control plane jointly allocates the time-frequency resources for TSN and 5G to support deterministic end-to-end transmission. Specifically, we design a novel control architecture, i.e., centralized network and distributed user, for the integrated networks to reduce the signaling overhead. Moreover, we formulate a stochastic optimization problem for IIoT scenarios to maximize the number of successfully scheduled flows as well as realize throughput fairness for wired and wireless equipment. Since the resource allocation of TSN and 5G are coupled, this problem is NP-hard. We propose a dueling double deep Q network (D3QN) based Joint Resource Allocation (DJRA) algorithm. By leveraging two convolution-enhanced neural networks, with their parameters periodically synchronized, the accuracy of the estimated Q-value can be increased and the convergence speed of DJRA can be accelerated. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can facilitate efficient cooperation between TSN and 5G as compared to the other heuristic and learning-based algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207