Liquid metal droplets impacting superhydrophobic surface in a viscous (non-oxidizing) environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hypothesis of the present research is the existence of distinct spatial-temporal characteristics of non-oxidized liquid metal (LM) droplets impacting a solid surface. To provide a quantitative claim to this hypothesis, we created a test matrix based on the well-known impingement regime map bounded by two dimensionless quantities—Weber number (We) and Ohnesorge number (Oh). The range of these quantities is from 10−2 to 102 (We) and 10−3 to 101 (Oh), leading to Reynolds number (Re) (≡We1/2/Oh) to vary from 10−2 to 104. The class of LMs opted for are post-transition metals—eutectic gallium alloys—due to their several desired practical features, such as low melting point, non-toxicity, and low vapor pressure. The research is conducted using numerical experiments performed using C++ OpenFOAM libraries. To ensure the reliability of the code, we tested our work with numerous impingement behaviors of fluids available in the literature. A plethora of droplet behaviors are reported, such as deposition, rebound, bubble entrapment, and splash. Several features of droplet impingement were critically examined, such as temporal spreading factor, maximum spreading factor, and contact time of droplets on the surfaces. Moreover, the conventional scaling laws regarding the impingement behavior of droplets were tested, with new ones proposed where deemed necessary. Furthermore, a distinct route for the entrapment of droplet is observed, caused by the bulging of LM droplet during the recoiling stage. Emphasis is made to form delineations for these impingement characteristics using dimensionless groups (i.e., We, Oh, and Re).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".