MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402168209 · doi:10.1016/j.geomat.2024.100021

Impacts of bridge constructions on channel dynamics and sediment aggradation: An integrated discussion, West Bengal, India

2024· article· en· W4402168209 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mery Biswas, Adrija Raha, Shubhadeep Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOMATICA · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggradationWest bengalBridge (graph theory)Channel (broadcasting)SedimentBENGALGeologyGeographyGeomorphologyEngineeringSociologyOceanographySocioeconomicsTelecommunicationsBay

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Channel dynamics, including channel migration, erosion, and deposition, is a significant geomorphological phenomenon. It has been noted that the Gish River exists with its widest extension between 1913 and 2021, causing a bottleneck situation. The section G4 (Gish-4) experienced the most significant squeezing character over time. The catchment landslide-induced sediments, mostly transported in the monsoon by 1st and 2nd order streams, deposited at the beds near the rail and road bridges of the rivers Lish, Gish, and Chel. Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) and sediment transport index (STI) maps specify the zones of sediment generation and aggradation. Results of low ‘b” value 0.77 + /−0.04 specify active tectonics and instability of the area. A petrographic analysis of landslide samples and river bed sediments justifies that the landslide connected streams are continuously transported and deposited in the river bed. In the Himalayan foothill rivers like Lish, Gish, and Chel, channel planform dynamics may be the result of landslide occurrences, that induce huge sediments in the rivers and sediment transport index indicates the deposition of the sediments near rail and road bridges in spatio-temporal scale. • The seven sections from each river have been taken into consideration as piedmont zone (L1,G1,C1), far upstream from the rail bridge (L2,G2,C2), upstream from the rail bridge (L3,G3,C3), between the rail and road bridge (L4,G4,C4), downstream from the road bridge (L5,G5,C5), far downstream from the road bridge (L6,G6,C6) and confluence (L7,G7,C7) [C- Chel, G-Gish and L-Lish]. This study reveals the channel shifting from 1913-1936, 1936-1943, 1943-1965, 1965-1984, 1984- 2008 and 2008-2021. • Landslide susceptibility mapping and 1st and 2nd order stream connecting landslides are marked. AHP model has been performed to assign weightage to the parameters to prepare the landslide susceptible map of the considered study area. • Sediment Transport Index (STI) shows maximum sediment has been concentrated in the upstream and downstream section of river Lish and Gish. • Gutenberg-Richter Relation with b-value across the study area and its adjacent zones specify the area to be active. • Petrography and digenetic features disclose the same mineral composition of landslide sediments connection streams and river bed sediments near bridge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.317
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGEOMATICASame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207