MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402170562 · doi:10.1364/optcon.533926

Compact intracavity mid-infrared upconversion detector – a systematic study

2024· article· en· W4402170562 on OpenAlexafffund
Tyler Kashak, Liam Flannigan, Ali Atwi, Daniel Poitras, Chang‐Qing Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Continuum · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhoton upconversionInfraredDetectorOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceOpticsRemote sensingPhysicsDopingGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mid-IR light detection based on intracavity upconversion using a compact structure has been studied experimentally and theoretically. The mid-IR detector consists of a 47.5 mm MgO doped periodically poled lithium niobate crystal placed in a resonant cavity of a 1064 nm diode-pumped Nd:YVO 4 laser to enhance efficiency. The generated 1064 nm light is mixed with a mid-infrared source emitting at 3469 nm using an intracavity dichroic mirror. This produces short wave infrared 814.2 nm light via sum frequency generation (SFG). The upconverted light overlaps with the high responsivity for commercial off-the-shelf silicon photodetectors, enabling high speed and high sensitivity detection, surpassing direct mid-infrared detection. The lowest power detected was 150 nW, and the theoretical noise equivalent power for state-of-the-art Si detectors is 1.7⋅ f W/Hz. The free-running cavity requires no active stabilization, and the total packaged prototype size is 3.75 × 3.0 × 8.0 cm, which is relatively compact. An experimental power conversion efficiency of up to 36.0% is observed, which agrees well with theoretical simulations. A systematic theoretical study is performed to investigate the potential for further device optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ContinuumSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207