MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402175781 · doi:10.56314/inhealth.v3i1.207

Isolasi Dan Identifikasi Molekuler Bakteri Penghasil Amilase Pada Produk Fermentasi Kentang Yukon Gold (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Berbasis GEN 16S RNA

2024· article· id· W4402175781 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nurhilaliyah

Bibliographic record

VenueINHEALTH INDONESIAN HEALTH JOURNAL · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolanum tuberosumBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kebutuhan amilase dan tingginya daya produksi enzim membuat pencarian sumber-sumber amilase yang baru sangat diperlukan salah satunya melalui proses fermentasi Kentang Yukon Gold (Solanum tuberosum, L.) yang mengandung 18,4 g karbohidrat selama 3 hari. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengisolasi bakteri penghasil enzim amilase yang berasal dari produk fermentasi kentang Yukon Gold. Uji penghasilan enzim amilase dilakukan pada media selektif Starch Agar (SA) Uji enzimatik isolat bakteri didapatkan 4 isolat. Proses identifikasi molekuler dilakukan melalui analisis sekuen gen 16S rRNA bakteri yang telah diamplifikasi berdasarkan metode PCR. DNA hasil dari amplifikasi kemudian di sekuensing menggunakan BLAST (Basic Local Aligment Searc Tool), isolate FST-1 merupakan isolat yang memiliki ideks amilolitiki terbesar dengan nilai 2,63. Hasil identifikasi isolate FST-1 didaptkan kemiripan 100% dengan bakteri Pseudomonas sutzeri sehingga isolate FST-1 diberi nama Pseudomonas sutzeri FST-1 (Fermented SolanumTuberosum-1). Kesimpulanya, strain FST-1 merupakan bakteri penghasil amilase yang potensial dan teridentifikasi sebagai Pseudomonas sutzeri srain FST-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINHEALTH INDONESIAN HEALTH JOURNALSame topicEnzyme Production and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207