Chromosomal diversity in <i>Crematogaster</i> Lund, 1831 (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) from the Amazon rainforest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crematogaster Lund, 1831 is a speciose ant genus globally distributed and easily recognizable. Although biogeographical theories explain some variation among Neotropical Crematogaster, several taxonomical issues remain unresolved. While cytogenetic approaches can help to delimit species, cytogenetic data are only available for 18 taxa. In this study, classical and molecular cytogenetic analyses were performed on five Crematogaster species from the Brazilian Amazon to identify species-specific patterns. Two different cytotypes, both with 2 n = 22 chromosomes were observed in Crematogaster erecta Mayr, 1866, suggesting the presence of cryptic species, although with different karyotypic formulas. Crematogaster aff. erecta had 2 n = 28, while Crematogaster limata Smith, 1858, Crematogaster tenuicula Forel, 1904, and Crematogaster sp. had 2 n = 38. The telomeric motif (TTAGG) n was found in all five species, and the (TCAGG) n motif was detected in the telomeres of C. limata. This peculiar motif was also detected in the centromeric regions of C. erecta cytotype I. The microsatellite (GA) n was dispersed in the chromosomes of all species studied, which also had a single intrachromosomal rDNA site. The cytogenetic results revealed notable interspecific and intraspecific variation, which suggests different chromosomal rearrangements involved in the origin of these variations, also highlighting the taxonomic value of cytogenetic data on Crematogaster.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".