MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402187008 · doi:10.1101/2024.09.02.24312942

High levels of IsoDGR-modified fibronectin are associated with higher levels of macrophages and other rupture-prone plaque characteristics in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy

2024· preprint· en· W4402187008 on OpenAlexaff
Tetiana Motsak, Barend M. Mol, Joost Hoekstra, Valentina Osorio Zuluaga, Saskia Rumpff-Derksen, Ioanna Paspali-Strik, Sofon Cam Ngan, Gerard Pasterkamp, Gert J. de Borst, Siu Kwan Sze, Dominique P.V. de Kleijn

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibronectinCarotid endarterectomyMacrophageEndarterectomyMedicinePathologyImmunohistochemistryStainingInternal medicineChemistryExtracellular matrixCarotid arteriesIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Deamidation of the NGR (Asn-Gly-Arg) motif to the isoDGR (isoAsp-Gly-Arg) motif in fibronectin (IsoDGR-fibronectin) enhances in vitro monocyte and endothelial cell activation. Blocking isoDGR reduces macrophage influx in murine tissues. Although macrophage influx is an important feature of human plaque destabilization, the role for plasma and plaque isoDGR-fibronectin in macrophage influx in the atherosclerotic plaque and thereby increasing plaque vulnerability has not been investigated in large human cohorts. Design: IsoDGR-fibronectin levels in plasma and plaques were measured in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients from the Athero Express biobank cohort and associated with macrophage and other vulnerable plaque characteristics in the carotid plaque of the same patient. Methods: Levels of isoDGR-fibronectin were measured using an ELISA. Carotid plaque characteristics were visualized with immunohistochemistry staining and scored semi-quantitatively. Baseline characteristics were analysed with Pearson`s Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney U-test when applicable. Univariate and multivariate logistics regression analyses were used to identify associations with adverse plaque characteristics. Results: Plasma isoDGR-fibronectin was measured in 730 CEA patients. Patients with moderate/heavy plaque macrophage staining had higher levels of isoDGR-fibronectin than patients with no/minor macrophage staining (multivariate OR 1.40 (95%CI 1.04-1.90, p=0.028)). Of the 730 CEA patients, 348 had plaque samples available for isoDGR-fibronectin measurements. In the multivariate analysis, higher plaque levels of isoDGR-fibronectin were associated with moderate/high plaque macrophage staining (OR 1.22 (95%CI 1.00-1.56, p=0.049)), >40% fat in plaque (OR 1.1.44 (95% CI 1.14-1.86, p=0.004)) and intraplaque haemorrhage (OR 1.38 (95% 1.12-1.72, p=0.003)). Conclusion: In this large human cohort study high plasma and plaque levels of isoDGR-fibronectin were associated with more plaque macrophages and other adverse plaque characteristics. This suggests the involvement of isoDGR-fibronectin in human plaque destabilization that may lead to new potential treatment modalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→