MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402191304 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.125102

Dynamics of nonthermal states in optimally doped <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.92</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Y</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.08</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>8</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> revealed by midinfrared three-pulse spectroscopy

2024· article· lv· W4402191304 on OpenAlexafffund
Angela Montanaro, Enrico Maria Rigoni, Francesca Giusti, Luisa Barba, Giuseppe Chita, Filippo Glerean, Giacomo Jarc, Shahla Yasmin Mathengattil, Fabio Boschini, Hiroshi Eisaki, M. Greven, A. Damascelli, Claudio Giannetti, D. Mihailović, V. V. Kabanov, Daniele Fausti

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2024
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaGordon and Betty Moore FoundationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhotoexcitationPhysicsQuasiparticlePairingAtomic physicsBand gapExcitationSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsExcited stateQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the cuprates, the opening of a $d$-wave superconducting (SC) gap is accompanied by a redistribution of spectral weight at energies two orders of magnitude larger than this gap. This indicates the importance to the pairing mechanism of on-site electronic excitations, such as orbital transitions or charge transfer excitations. Here, we resort to a three-pulse pump-probe scheme to study the broadband nonequilibrium dielectric function in optimally doped $\mathrm{B}{\mathrm{i}}_{2}\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{r}}_{2}\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{a}}_{0.92}{\mathrm{Y}}_{0.08}\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{u}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{8+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ and we identify an interband excitation peaked at 2 eV whose spectral weight is transiently modified by the pump. Photoexcitation with near-infrared and midinfrared pulses, with photon energies, respectively, above and below the SC gap, reveals that the spectral weight dynamics is different for different pump wavelengths and depends on the time order of the two photoexcitations. The picture that emerges is that, while high-energy pulses excite quasiparticles in both nodal and thermally inaccessible antinodal states, photoexcitation by low-energy pulses mostly accelerates the condensate and creates excitations predominantly at the nodes of the SC gap. These results, rationalized by simulations based on the kinetic equations for $d$-wave superconducting gaps, indicate that dynamical control of the momentum-dependent distribution of nonthermal quasiparticles may be achieved by the selective tuning of the photoexcitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B→Same topicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism→French-language works237,207→