MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402203843 · doi:10.4103/ijoth.ijoth_62_22

Social Inclusion of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Educational Setting

2023· article· en· W4402203843 on OpenAlexaff
Malvika Samnani, Sujata Shahi, Atul Jaiswal, Stephen H. Shore, Manish Samnani

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Indian Journal of Occupational Therapy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsAssociation for Canadian Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorderInclusion (mineral)AutismSpectrum (functional analysis)PsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPhysicsSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Social inclusion is described as the process of improving the terms of participation in society, particularly for disadvantaged individuals. This includes the capacity to make friends, participate in community activities, engage in leisure, and play, and have access to outstanding inclusive classroom practices. Social isolation of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) is well documented in research and inclusive education as a policy that strives to achieve full participation of all children in the school/classroom setting. However, it is not very well known about “What literature exists on social inclusion of children with autism in educational settings?” Objective: The aim of this scoping review was to analyze empirical studies on social inclusion of children with ASD in the educational settings over the past 20 years. Study Design: This was a scoping review. Methods: A systematic process was used to conduct the review as suggested by Arksey and O'Malley strategy for scoping review. This strategy consists of five main steps: (a) identifying the research question, (b) identifying relevant studies, (c) selection of critical articles, (d) reviewing and charting the data, and (e) collating and summarizing the results. A total of more than 15,000 articles were searched in a total of 4 databases, namely Scopus, PubMed, ERIC, and Cochrane, and used Google Scholar as the search engine. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses model was followed to shortlist the articles based on title, abstract, and full article. Finally, 39 selected articles were summarized. Results: This scoping review study highlights the literature on social inclusion of ASD children and summarizes a variety of studies that help us better understand the issues that teachers and children face in the inclusion environment. The studies also describe how inclusion enhances social communication in ASD children. Conclusion: This study helped us to find experiences, key concepts, evidence types, and research gaps by synthesizing current knowledge through systematic search to appraise the stakeholders for social inclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Indian Journal of Occupational TherapySame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207