Evaluation of the impact of hydrological changes on reservoir water management: A comparative analysis the CanESM5 model and the optimized SWAT-SVR-LSTM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research examines the impacts of climate change and socio-economic variables on the hydrological cycle, reservoir water management, and hydropower capacity at the Gezhouba Dam. The Gezhouba Dam serves as a crucial hydroelectric power station and dam, playing a vital role in regulating river flow and generating electricity. In this study, an innovative method is employed, combining the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models. This model is optimized using the Developed Thermal Exchange Optimizer. This optimized combined model significantly enhances the reliability and precision of the forecasting inflow and reservoir levels. By utilizing the Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5), we examine climate variables across various scenarios of Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP). Under the SSP5-RCP8.5 scenario, the most aggressive in terms of emissions, we project a temperature rise of 2.6 % and a precipitation decrease of 2.7 %. This scenario leads to the most substantial changes in the hydrological cycle and altered river flow patterns. The results show a direct correlation between precipitation and inflow (0.952) and a strong inverse correlation between temperature and inflow (0.893). The study predicts significant decreases in all flow metrics, with mean high flow (Q5) periods affecting hydropower generation, especially under the SSP5-RCP8.5 scenario. Additionally, the filling frequency rate (FFR) and mean filling level (MFL) are projected to decrease, with a more pronounced decline in the far future, indicating a potential compromise of the reservoir's water storage and power generation capabilities, especially under the SSP5-RCP8.5 scenario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".