MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402214393 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6psqw

Testing the overlap between symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia: A multi-site study

2024· preprint· en· W4402214393 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rafal M. Skiba, Abhijit Chinchani, Mahesh Menon, Martín Lepage, Katie M. Lavigne, Ashok Malla, Ridha Joober, Joel O. Goldberg, R. Walter Heinrichs, David Castle, Amy Burns, Michael W. Best, Susan L. Rossell, Sebastian Walther, Todd S. Woodward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)CognitionPsychologyCognitive psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Hypothesis. Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). While the relationship between cognition and symptoms in SSD has been extensively studied, there is a lack of research focusing on individual item-level analysis rather than relying on summary score methodology. Our previous study on a first-episode psychosis cohort showed that symptoms related to impoverished and disorganized communication and motor impoverishment were associated with impairments in verbal and working memory. This study aimed to explore those associations in people with chronic schizophrenia.Study Design. We employed iterative Constrained Principal Component Analysis (iCPCA) to investigate the relationship between 15 cognitive measures, including processing speed, attention, working, verbal memory, reasoning, problem-solving and 26 PANSS items in 198 chronic schizophrenia outpatients from two sites in Australia and one in Canada. The iCPCA method was used to determine item combinations optimized to describe associations between symptoms and cognition while controlling Type I errors.Results. Our analysis revealed that a verbal memory component was associated with the PANSS item Lack of Spontaneity and Flow of Conversation, indicating impairments in communication, language, and thought. Additionally, a working memory and attention component was linked to the PANSS item Motor Retardation, reflecting motor system impoverishment.Conclusions. These results confirm our previous findings, showing that negative symptoms of diminished expression are key predictors of cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. These data underscore the value of optimized item combinations in identifying precise symptom-cognition relationships, which can potentially inform more effective treatment strategies.Keywords: schizophrenia, cognition, psychotic symptoms, verbal and working memory, motor impoverishment, disorganized and impoverished communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMental Health Research Topics→French-language works237,207→