MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402247295 · doi:10.5588/pha.24.0016

TB burden and diagnostic challenges at Sandaun Provincial Hospital in West Sepik Province of PNG, 2016–2021

2024· article· en· W4402247295 on OpenAlexaff
S. Bita, Trevor Kelebi, A Holmes, Stefanie Vaccher, Subeer S. Majumdar, Jane Greig

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic Health Action · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsProvincial Health Services Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLogistic regressionSputumPediatricsTuberculosisInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SETTING: Bacteriological confirmation of TB diagnosis remains a key operational challenge in Papua New Guinea. Sandaun Provincial Hospital (SPH) is the main TB diagnostic and treatment centre of West Sepik Province. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate TB caseload, patient characteristics, and quality of diagnosis at SPH between 2016 and 2021. DESIGN: A retrospective descriptive study using TB treatment, laboratory, and presumptive TB registers to collect data on all TB patients. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine factors associated with bacteriological confirmation. RESULTS: = 0.002). The proportion bacteriologically confirmed was low (37.3%), being higher in young adults 15-44 years (50.6%, 377/745) than in children <15 years (6.3%, 20/319) or older adults ≥45 years (37.6%, 68/181). Bacteriological confirmation was less likely in people travelling ≥3 hours to a health facility (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.97) and extrapulmonary TB (aOR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00-0.03) but more likely for retreatment cases (aOR 1.59, 95% CI 1.00-2.51). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic services in West Sepik Province need strengthening to achieve a higher proportion of bacteriological confirmation in new pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB cases of all ages and improve access for the rural population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublic Health ActionSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207