COBRA-LIKE4 modulates cellulose synthase velocity and facilitates cellulose deposition in the secondary cell wall
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cellulose is a critical component of secondary cell walls (CWs) and woody tissues of plants. Cellulose synthase (CESA) complexes (CSCs) produce cellulose as they move within the plasma membrane, extruding glucan chains into the CW that coalesce and often crystallize into cellulose fibrils. Here we examine COBRA-LIKE4 (COBL4), a GPI-anchored protein on the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane that is required for normal cellulose deposition in secondary CWs. Characterization of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) cobl4 mutant alleles called irregular xylem6, irx6-2 and irx6-3, showed reduced α-cellulose content and lower crystallinity, supporting a role for COBL4 in maintaining cellulose quantity and quality. In live-cell imaging, mNeon Green-tagged CESA7 moved in the plasma membrane at higher speeds in the irx6-2 background compared to wild-type. To test conservation of COBL4 function between herbaceous and woody plants, poplar (Populus trichocarpa) COBL4 homologs PtCOBL4a and PtCOBL4b were transformed into, and rescued, the Arabidopsis irx6 mutants. Using the Arabidopsis secondary CW-inducible VND7-GR system to study poplar COBL4 dynamics, YFP-tagged PtCOBL4a localized to the plasma membrane in regions of high cellulose deposition in secondary CW bands. As predicted for a lipid-linked protein, COBL4 was more mobile in the plane of the plasma membrane than CESA7 or a control plasma membrane marker. Following programmed cell death, COBL4 anchored to the secondary CW bands. These data support a role for COBL4 as a modulator of cellulose organization in the secondary CW, influencing cellulose production, and CSC velocity at the plasma membrane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".