MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402255749 · doi:10.32920/26950435.v1

Investigating Sustainability Reporting Standards in Multinational Canadian Publicly Traded Companies Operating in Emerging Economies

2024· preprint· en· W4402255749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Management Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultinational corporationSustainability reportingBusinessSustainabilityEmerging marketsAccountingCommerceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>This thesis seeks to investigate how sustainability reporting standards can be used to assess strategic performance in emerging economies by multinational Canadian publicly traded companies. Interviews were conducted and took place between July 2020 and July 2021. The organizational participants comprised a total of 22 sustainability experts and executives from eleven different multinational Canadian publicly traded companies operating in emerging economies. The in-depth semi-structured interviews were the primary method utilized to tackle the principal and sub-research questions. A critical review of the literature showed that relatively little research is dedicated to the methods employed in integrating and evaluating sustainability activities and performance from a strategic viewpoint. Consequently, this thesis seeks to address a significant research gap. </p> <p>Building on the existing study, this study conducted a systematic review of sustainability or equivalent reports and semi-structured interview responses from the sustainability executives using qualitative content analysis. This thesis designed and proposed an original analytical framework that provides a systematic approach to the integration of sustainability with organizational processes and mainstream infrastructure of multinational Canadian publicly traded companies operating in emerging economies. The proposed analytical framework is reinforced by a sustainability integration strategy map and sustainability integration performance measures to help guide the implementation process. The proposed analytical framework, the supported strategy map, and performance measures are based on the “Balanced Scorecard Framework” and may help guide multinational Canadian publicly traded companies through the process of organizing and structuring sustainability into their critical business infrastructure. This study found that none of the organizational participants had utilized sustainability reporting standards to assess their strategic performance in emerging economies. The findings also illustrate how a ‘synergy’ and coherence can be created between strategic and sustainability performance measurements and sustainability reporting standards through an ‘aggregate measurement’ process.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuality and Management SystemsFrench-language works237,207