Utilizing Deep Reinforcement Learning for Energy Trading in Microgrids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration of renewable energy sources (RES) within microgrids necessitates innovative approaches to optimize energy distribution and trading, addressing both sustainability and efficiency. This research paper explores the application of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) as a pivotal technology for enabling intelligent energy trading strategies in microgrids. DRL, characterized by its ability to learn optimal policies through the interaction with the environment, offers a promising solution to the complex, dynamic, and uncertain nature of energy markets. The study proposes a novel DRL framework tailored for microgrid energy trading, incorporating state-of-the-art algorithms that are adept at handling high-dimensional state spaces and providing real-time decision-making capabilities. The framework is evaluated through extensive simulations, utilizing real-world data to model the dynamics of energy supply, demand, and pricing within microgrids. Results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed DRL-based approach in optimizing energy trades, enhancing grid stability, and maximizing economic returns compared to traditional methods. Furthermore, the adaptability and scalability of the DRL framework are highlighted, showcasing its potential to accommodate varying microgrid configurations and renewable energy penetration levels. This research contributes to the evolving field of smart grid management, offering insights into leveraging advanced AI techniques for sustainable and efficient energy systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".