MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B065: A phase 1 study of abemaciclib, a CDK 4/6 inhibitor, with radiation in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG)

2024· article· en· W4402266765 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas F. Cash, Dolly Aguilera, Zhulin He, Melissa Schink, Amanda K. Sykes, Celine Pitou, Erin Connelly, Bree R. Eaton, Natia Esiashvili, Ross Mangum, Margaret E. Macy, Robert C. Castellino, Jason Fangusaro, Tobey J. MacDonald, Cynthia Wetmore, Lindsey M. Hoffman

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCyclin-dependent kinaseGliomaOncologyCancerInternal medicineCancer researchCell cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) control cell cycle progression through phosphorylation of Rb. Tumor tissue studies in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) demonstrate frequent alterations in cell cycle regulatory proteins, including CDK 4/6, and infrequent deletions in Rb1. Preclinical DIPG studies have demonstrated prolonged survival when CDK 4/6 inhibition is added to radiation therapy (RT) compared to RT alone. Abemaciclib is a selective and potent, orally bioavailable small molecule CDK 4/6 inhibitor that crosses the blood brain barrier. We conducted a Phase 1 trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of abemaciclib administered concurrently with RT, and to describe the toxicity and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, in patients with newly diagnosed DIPG. METHODS: Patients 2-25 years of age with newly diagnosed DIPG were eligible. A CDK 4/6 pathway alteration was not required, and patients with known RB1 mutations were excluded. Abemaciclib was administered orally twice daily on days 1-28 of a 28-day cycle. Four dose levels (DLs) were evaluated using a rolling-six design: 75 (DL0), 100 (DL1), 130 (DL2), and 170 (DL3) mg/m2/dose. Abemaciclib started concurrently with RT and was continued as maintenance after completion of RT until the patient experienced progression or unacceptable toxicity. The 6-week duration of RT (54 Gy in 30 fractions) constituted the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period. The PKs of abemaciclib were evaluated at serial timepoints. RESULTS: Median age of the 22 enrolled patients was 7.1 years (range: 2.6 - 20.1). Eleven (50%) patients were biopsied; 10 were histologically defined as H3K27M mutant diffuse midline glioma. In seventeen DLT-evaluable patients, there was 1 DLT during the DLT evaluation period, grade 3 nausea that occurred on DL3. There were 5 DLTs during maintenance: 3 episodes of prolonged grade 3 neutropenia (DL1=1 and DL2=2) and one episode of grade 4 neutropenia (DL0), and grade 3 weight loss (DL3). The predominant abemaciclib-related toxicities were low-grade and hematologic in nature, including leukopenia (80%), lymphopenia (70%), neutropenia (65%), diarrhea (60%), anemia (50%), and nausea (45%). PK analysis demonstrated that abemaciclib exposure increased with increasing dose. The apparent clearance (CL/F) increased with increasing weight/body surface area, and there was extensive variability in exposure across doses and weight ranges. Mean abemaciclib trough concentrations achieved the target associated with preclinical and clinical efficacy (200 ng/mL) at the 130 and 170 mg/m2 dose levels. The median progression-free survival for all patients was 7.5 months (range: 3.0-21.3) and median overall survival was 12.4 months (range: 2.6-29.0); 2 (10%) patients survived > 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of abemaciclib administered concurrently with RT to pediatric patients with newly diagnosed DIPG was 170 mg/m2/dose administered orally twice daily on a 28-day cycle. Abemaciclib was well-tolerated with mainly low-grade hematologic toxicity and diarrhea. Citation Format: Thomas Cash, Dolly Aguilera, Zhulin He, Melissa Schink, Amanda Sykes, Celine Pitou, Erin Connelly, Bree Eaton, Natia Esiashvili, Ross Mangum, Margaret E. Macy, Robert C. Castellino, Jason Fangusaro, Tobey J. MacDonald, Cynthia Wetmore, Lindsey Hoffman. A phase 1 study of abemaciclib, a CDK 4/6 inhibitor, with radiation in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr B065.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207